Cohere’s post appears to frame the future-of-work debate as limited by weak or incomplete evidence. Based on the title alone, its likely focus is not a product announcement but a commentary on how claims about AI’s workplace impact should be evaluated. The central takeaway is that policymakers, employers, and researchers should avoid overconfident predictions without better data.
This study analyzes 3.4 million real applicants and 4 million applications across 156 U.S. employers. It finds position-level racial adverse impact that aggregate analysis can obscure, especially affecting Black and Asian applicants. The authors also show that reliance on a single vendor can create homogeneous outcomes and systemic rejections, calling for stronger audits, surveillance, and researcher access.