Anthropic has cut off access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models after receiving a government order tied to national security concerns. The order reportedly required the company to block access for all foreign nations, including access from inside and outside the US. Anthropic responded by removing access for all customers, and the order also applied to Anthropic employees.
Anthropic has suspended access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for foreign nationals, citing a U.S. government export-control directive tied to national security concerns. The company reportedly says the situation stems from a misunderstanding and is seeking to restore service. The article states that other Anthropic models are not affected by the restriction.
Ars Technica reports that Anthropic shut down its Fable and Mythos models following a directive from the Trump administration. The Commerce Department was reportedly concerned that a Fable 5 jailbreak could create a national security threat. Based on the provided excerpt, the article frames the shutdown as a government-driven AI safety and security intervention, but it does not specify the technical details of the jailbreak or the scope of the models’ deployment.
Major AI rivals including leaders from Anthropic, OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta, and Google DeepMind signed an open letter urging US lawmakers to close a biosecurity gap. They want companies selling synthetic DNA and RNA to screen orders for sequences that could help create dangerous pathogens. The concern is that more capable AI tools and cheaper biology infrastructure could lower barriers to misuse.
Ars Technica reports that Trump’s administration is considering government safety tests for advanced AI models before deployment. Critics argue the plan may be short-sighted and performative because DOGE cuts have weakened the US teams best positioned to conduct serious AI security reviews. The concern is that testing without staffing, transparency, and enforcement may not prevent dangerous deployments.
INSIDE examines how China’s Amap has become controversial in Taiwan beyond ordinary mapping or navigation use. The article says its service relies on user data and AI-based inference rather than full official data integrations. That model could send movement traces and behavioral signals back to China, creating risks for hybrid warfare intelligence, influence operations, and Taiwan’s broader governance of map data and digital infrastructure.
In this column published in Interconnects, author Nathan Lambert cites the latest observations from policy expert Dean Ball on the high-profile "Anthropic v…